Global PMO Institute logo

Disciplinary Policy

GPMOi Disciplinary Policy

The disciplinary framework protects the credibility of GPMOi certifications by handling misconduct claims with fairness, transparency, and consistency.

1. Purpose

The Disciplinary Policy outlines how the Global PMO Institute responds to alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct, Exam Policy, or other certification requirements. It aims to safeguard the integrity of certifications and the reputation of the Institute and its professionals.

2. Scope

The policy applies to:

  • Candidates applying for or taking GPMOi certification exams.
  • Certified professionals (CI-PMO, QP-PMO, EP-PMO, CPMO-A, and micro-certifications).
  • Accredited Training and Exam Partners (ATEPs) delivering certification-related services.

3. Principles of Enforcement

Every investigation is guided by five principles:

  • Impartiality – cases are reviewed objectively, free of bias.
  • Due process – individuals are informed of allegations and may respond.
  • Proportionality – sanctions align with the severity of the violation.
  • Confidentiality – information is shared strictly on a need-to-know basis.
  • Consistency – decisions follow established precedent to ensure fairness.

4. Categories of Misconduct

4.1 Examination-related misconduct

  • Cheating, collusion, or impersonation.
  • Unauthorised disclosure or reproduction of exam content.
  • Disruption of exam administration.

4.2 Professional misconduct

  • Misrepresentation of credentials or experience.
  • Failure to uphold the GPMOi Code of Conduct.
  • Breach of confidentiality or misuse of organisational information.
  • Cultural insensitivity, discrimination, or harassment in professional practice.

4.3 Partner-related misconduct

  • Failure of Accredited Training and Exam Partners to comply with accreditation standards.
  • Misuse of GPMOi branding, logos, or intellectual property.

5. Disciplinary Process

  1. Allegation submission – cases may be reported by candidates, employers, partners, or exam administrators with supporting evidence.
  2. Preliminary review – the Secretariat validates credibility; unfounded cases close, credible ones proceed to the Certification Council.
  3. Formal investigation – a panel is appointed, the accused is notified, and a written response is requested.
  4. Decision – evidence is evaluated and sanctions assigned according to severity and precedent.
  5. Appeal – the accused may appeal within 30 days; an independent panel reviews the case.

6. Sanctions

  • Written warning.
  • Suspension (temporary loss of certification privileges).
  • Revocation (permanent withdrawal of certification).
  • Ineligibility for future GPMOi programmes.
  • Partner sanctions, including suspension or termination of accreditation.

7. Recordkeeping and Transparency

  • All actions are recorded in the certification system.
  • Revocations appear in the Public Registry of Sanctions unless prohibited by law.
  • Records are retained for a minimum of seven years.

8. Closing Statement

The GPMOi Disciplinary Policy ensures certification remains a mark of trust, credibility, and professionalism by upholding accountability across the community.